I’ve just returned from an August 27 conference at Chonnam 全南 University in Gwangju 光州, Korea, entitled “Reflection on Philosophical Roots of Korean Emotion,” which covered Daoism, Confucianism, and Buddhism. For me this was an interesting and unusual event, as most of the presentations were in Korean, with simultaneous interpretation. I’m grateful to Prof. Yonghwan Chung and the other organizers, who arranged a very successful program. It was a pleasure to see old friends such as Hagop Sarkissian and Georg Moeller and to meet many new colleagues from Korea, China, and Japan.

My contribution to the conference was an extension of recent work I’ve done on Zhuangzi. A precis follows. (Read more…)

I will be offering two undergraduate courses in the 2010–2011 academic year:

Semester 1: PHIL2470 Moral Psychology in the Chinese Tradition

Semester 2: PHIL1004 Chinese and Western Thought: An Introduction to Philosophy


For readers interested in Mohism, I’ve posted a preprint of a forthcoming paper on “The Ethics of the Mohist ‘Dialogues’.” This is my contribution to a new anthology on the Mozi edited by Carine Defoort and Nicolas Standaert, to be published by Brill probably in 2011.

A long-term research interest of mine is to bring classical Chinese epistemology into dialogue with contemporary epistemology. I’ve just posted a preprint of one contribution to this project, an extensively revised version of my paper “Knowledge and Error in Early Chinese Thought.” The paper is forthcoming in Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy.

The editing work on our forthcoming anthology, Ethics in Early China, is about done. The volume is edited by myself, Dan Robins, and Timothy O’Leary and will be published by HKU Press. A table of contents is available here.

Update (May 8, 2010): A pdf preprint of the Introduction is available here.

I’ve posted another older preprint, this time of a paper from 2008: “Psychological Emptiness in the Zhuangzi,” Asian Philosophy 18.1 (2008), 123-47.

On April 23, 2010, the “Philosophy, Therapy, and Medicine” research cluster of HKU’s Centre for the Humanities and Medicine will hold a research workshop entitled “Death: Philosophy, Therapy, Medicine.”  The workshop is organized by my colleague Barbara Dalle Pezze. I’ll be giving a talk entitled “Xúnzǐ and Zhuāngzǐ: Two Approaches to Death in Classical Chinese Thought,” as part of a panel on “Death, Dying, and Bereavement: Cross-cultural Considerations.” An abstract follows. (Read more…)

I’ve posted a discussion of the significance of Zhuangist political thought here at “Warp, Weft, and Way.”

I’ve posted a preprint of a paper of mine from 2006: “Zhuangzi, Xunzi, and the Paradoxical Nature of Education.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33.4 (2006): 529–42. I’ll be gradually adding online versions of more old papers here.

I was asked recently to recommend a textbook or two on Classical Chinese. Although I myself don’t teach language courses, my understanding is that two recent textbooks are both quite good. Read on…

On Dec. 10–11, 2009, the HKU Department of Philosophy hosted a quite successful international conference on comparative philosophy: “Happiness East & West.” Details are here.

The conference organizer was my colleague Timothy O’Leary. Much thanks to Timothy for planning the event and to the Louis Cha Fund, the HKU Faculty of Arts, and the HKU School of Humanities for their sponsorship.

My own contribution to the “Happiness” conference is called “Wandering the Way: A Eudaimonistic Approach to the Zhuangzi.”

Update (Jan 3 2010): A working draft of my paper is here. A précis follows. Read on…

Just this week I learned that this site is not accessible from mainland China because the Great Firewall of China (防火長城) blocks all WordPress sites, along with those of several other weblog providers. Thanks to Manyul Im, however, I also learned that there is an easy way to “fān qiáng” 翻墙, or topple the Great Firewall. Read more…

Manyul Im has transformed his very successful Chinese Philosophy Blog into a new group blog devoted to Chinese and comparative philosophy. The new blog is called “Warp, Weft, and Way.” (Manyul’s old blog will remain online as an archive.) As one of the administrators of the new blog, I encourage everyone — especially students — to visit and to comment on posts, if you have observations or arguments to offer or questions to raise.

I’ve added to the site a revised version of a paper called “Action and Agency in Early Chinese Thought,” originally written for a conference in 2005.

I’ve posted an extensively revised preprint of my essay “Mohism and Motivation,” first posted here in November 2008.

Update (14 Mar 2010): A slightly revised final version has now been posted.

A number of HKU philosophy students seem to be visiting this site, so I thought I’d put up a post to say “Hello.” I will be serving as undergraduate coordinator and chief examiner in the Department of Philosophy for the coming academic year. I look forward to meeting many of you and working closely with you. See you in September!

Addendum: If you are planning on majoring in philosophy, please have a look at the guidelines on this page.

For visitors looking for my pages discussing graduate study in Chinese philosophy, they begin from the links on this page.

I’ve just published a revised version of my Stanford Encyclopedia article on Mohism. Most of the revisions are minor, however. They include a smattering of substantive changes and rectification of some copy-editing errors that had crept in.

From June 25–28, I will be attending what promises to be quite an interesting workshop hosted by Professors Carine Defoort and Nicolas Standaert at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven entitled “The Many Faces of Mozi: A Synchronic and Diachronic Study of Mohist Thought.” Despite the title, the workshop actually focuses on the “Dialogue” and “Summary” books of the Mozi, not the core essays. My own paper is on the ethical thought of the Mohist “Dialogues,” specifically how they differ from the core essays. An abstract follows.

Read more…

I’ve just published a major revision of my entry on Mohist Canons in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Much of the article has been rewritten. The sections on epistemology and ethics have been expanded, and the section on methods of argumentation has been significantly revised. (In particular, I have changed the interpretation of móu 侔, largely in response to problems with my earlier account that Dan Robins pointed out to me in 2007.)